A Far Cry from Africa by Derek Walcott, as a Postcolonial dilemma of the speaker's legacy

"A Far Cry from Africa" by Derek Walcott presents the speaker’s dilemma of colonialism.

Or,

"A Far Cry from Africa" by Derek Walcott presents the speaker’s dilemma of painful legacy between the colonizer and the colonized.

Answer: The poem "A Far Cry from Africa" is a reflection of the Mau Mau Rebellion that took place in the mid-twentieth century when African Kenyans fought for independence against the British colonial rule. The speaker of the poem has connections to both Africa and England and has been at odds over how to explain the violence of this conflict. By identifying himself intimately with the poet Walcott, the speaker of the poem is painfully divided even among the African colonists in his connection with English. Indeed, what the poem clearly argues is a misguided identity and it is worrisome because colonialism is an element that dominates in the vein of painful legacy.

Here it is important to know some historical context to understand the indecision of the speaker. The Mau Mau or Kenya Land and Freedom Army (KLFA) was a rebel of the Kikuyu tribe of Kenya that lasted for eight consecutive years from 1952 to 1960. The people of the Kikuyu tribe in Kenya waged a terrible guerrilla war against English colonialism. The British response to the revolt was even more ruthless.

So, how does the speaker react when asked:

The British later provoked a brutal response. These lines embody the speaker’s internal divisions between England and Africa and leave the two sides as bilaterally opposing choices.

The speaker felt that a violent and decisive response was needed to the violence of the Mau Mau rebellion. Either someone has to condemn Mau Mau and stand by England, or Mau Mau has to support and abandon England altogether; Accept the violence of the Mau Mau uprising as necessary for Kenya's independence, or reject such violence and reject every connection with Africa and the colonized people in the process. Between these two options the speaker is suspended, unable to determine.

Thus, the speaker feels isolated from all sides of the dispute. At the same time, the speaker considers himself involved with both the British and Kenyans. This implies that the speaker has a colonial tradition, descended from both English colonists and colonial Africans. As a result, the speaker feels that his own body has been divided by this conflict.

In the third stanza, the speaker addresses the issue explicitly:

The word "poisoned" conveys the powerful idea of provoking the Mau Mau rebellion in the speaker’s mind. Although the speaker has "both blood" from Europeans and Africans, meaning descendants of either sides - this blood feels poisonous, connecting the speaker to violence no matter it would be.

This tradition also makes the speaker poisonous, because the speaker thinks he is divided into veins. The way the speaker presents the twists, as if, half the blood of the speaker is half violent. So the speaker thinks that the poem is very personal and even physically divided by composing this conflict. For the speaker, this is not a matter of abstract politics, but a truly intimate struggle that has taken place within him a struggle over the legacy of colonialism. Thus, colonial history has compelled the speaker to this example which is forever divided by colonized and colonizer.

*****

Also Read: 😀

👉 A Doll’s House as a Feminist Play

👉 Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett as an Absurd Drama

👉 Vladimir's character in Beckett’s play, Waiting for Godot

👉 Estragon’s character in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot

👉 Tonight I can write the saddest lines… by Pablo Neruda (Summary)

👉 Nora’s Character - A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen

👉 The Good Woman of Setzuan - The role of Gods

👉 Rhinoceros by Eugene Ionesco - Theater of the Absurd

👉 Revolving Days by David Malouf - poem of memories of a past love

👉 A Far Cry from Africa as a Postcolonial dilemma of the speaker's legacy